It’s amazing how some people can play with words especially with English one and how the others accept to be deceived. What struck me in the first place was the word “rogue states” during my Histo-Geo class. In the dictionary, “rogue” means °undisciplined, uncontrollable, °ungovernable but above all “Independent”; in other words rogue states bluntly mean Independent states in American’s foreign policy terms. The first in the long list of rogue states is Cuba, severely punished by 50 years of commercial embargo because they dare to defy Uncle Sam and fought for independence. Despite the fact that a vast majority of American people are now for a re-establishment of the diplomatic relation with Cuba, the government never agreed on because to accept Cuba as it is now is also accepting its freedom Castro had long striven for. There are also Iraq who first received US support during Iran-Iraq war and ultimately ended as we have witnessed on TV, Iran whose actual nuclear plants are inherited from the US-backed dictator regime of Shah suddenly turned into a “rogue state” like the former when they became independent and decide to manage by themselves their natural ressources knowing for instance that Iran has the largest gaz reserve after Russia.
Apart from “rogue” there is the famous “Third World”/Developing countries who defined in the beginning the nonaligned countries according to Bandung conference lead by Nehru but now describes “peoples who are culturally retarded in their attitudes, customs, and technical abilities”. As Michael Parenti stated in Against Empire: “it is a convenient notion embraced by those who want to depict Western investments as a rescue operation designed to help backward peoples help themselves. This myth of “cultural backwardness” goes back to ancient times, when conquerors used it to justify enslaving indigenous peoples. It was used by European colonizers over the last five centuries for the same purpose. When we say a country is “underdeveloped,” we are implying that it is backward and retarded in some way, that its people have shown little capacity to achieve and evolve. The negative connotations of “underdeveloped” has caused the United Nations, the Wall Street Journal, and parties of various political persuasion to refer to Third World countries as “developing” nations, a term somewhat less insulting than “underdeveloped” but equally misleading. I prefer to use “Third World” because “developing” seems to be just a euphemistic way of saying “underdeveloped but belatedly starting to do something about it.”
Rogue states, third world, structural adjustments, free trade & globalization (as if every country can export their good freely, if they can produce), International Monetary Fuck (as if every country can take from the Fund without restriction when in need), International court (as if every political leaders of the world including the West can be brought in courts when they kill entire population and attack another country)… ; and ofcourse there is AGOA or the African Growth and Opportunity Act for Madagascar (and other African countries) intended to bring growth and hatch opportunity to whose who are lacking in. Like the non exhaustive list of words above that sound good but in fact perpetuate the system of man made poverty and inequality, AGOA serves only the US itself as to be elligible in it, the granted country has to comply with several conditions including good governance. Good governance itself means agreeing that the US has control over the local economy but in no way fighting poverty, corruption or giving the Malagasy people better education and access to health care. In addidtion, the clothes manufacturing factory who can export to US market, from which Madagascar is supposed to draw its growth, are owned by foreigners so how comes it would be possible. Should we laugh or take the threat seriously when the resident US ambassador Niels Marquardt (formerly US ambassador in Cameroun responsible of lucrative mining contracts) says that they will cut AGOA within 15th December if a consensus government is not set up. It is sad that the low cost labours will be on the street again as to embitter the political situation but thinking that Agoa will bring growth to Madagascar or taking it as a viable economic development will just lead us to dystopia.












Recent Comments